Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/04/Category:Wijdenaardbrug (Gent)

This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Wijdenaardbrug (Gent)

@Paul Hermans: You seem to feel the category should be at Category:Wijdenaardbrug (Gent) (currently redirected) not Category:Wijngaardbrug (Gent). Would you care to explain why? Please don't blank redirects and leave empty categories when you don't like the way things are organized. Themightyquill (talk) 07:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See article on the Dutch wikipedia: nl:Wijdenaardbrug: Multiple bridges have been sequentially constructed on the same site. the first bridges, including the one built in 1885, was called Wijngaardbrug. The last bridge, built in 2007, is called Wijdenaardbrug. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the present situation be reflected on commons? The pictures are all of the bridge built in 2007 and should bear the name of the 2007 bridge as well as the category's name.Paul Hermans (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oei, ik heb zonet informatie toegevoegd aan de Category. Reverten of voorlopig laten staan? Lotje (talk) 16:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: Thanks but it's fine. I don't think it impacts the discussion here. Do you have any thoughts on what the category should be called? - Themightyquill (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Themightyquill: why not put the former name between brackets with the redirects? Category:Wijdenaardbrug (Wijngaardbrug) Gent

Lotje (talk) 03:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ResolvedThe category is now renamed to the actual name the bridge has. Romaine (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category moved to Category:Wijdenaardbrug (Gent) by Romaine. Please see Commons:Categories for discussion on how to close discussions. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]